Musings of a Marfan Mom

January 5, 2010
by marfmom
6 Comments

Genetic Testing for Marfan Syndrome

Today’s post comes from a question from Tom:
How did you ensure you didn’t pass Marfan on to your child? Any good links/resources on that process?

This is a great question! First, I’ll briefly explain how Marfan works.

Marfan is what’s called an autosomal dominant disorder. This means that it is a single mutation that causes Marfan and if you have the mutation, you have Marfan, at least to some degree (there are mild cases to severe cases). You can’t be a carrier, like you could with something like cystic fibrosis. This also means that children have a 50/50 chance of inheriting Marfan from the affected parent. Marfan happens equally among men and women and across all races.

If you decide to have a baby the old fashioned way, there is no way to guarantee that your child won’t have Marfan. This is the option my husband and I decided on. It was just luck that Menininho doesn’t have Marfan. If we have another biological baby, s/he has the same 50% chance of having Marfan that he did.

If you want to try to be sure that your biological child doesn’t inherit Marfan, genetic testing may be an option. First, the affected parent must be tested. 90-95% of people who meet the clinical criteria for Marfan test are able to have their mutation identified. A negative test result doesn’t necessarily mean that you don’t have Marfan (although it could mean you have a related disorder instead, like Loeys-Dietz syndrome, MASS Phenotype, or a form of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome). Dr. Dietz, one of the world’s pre-eminent Marfan researchers, explained it to the teens at conference like this. We know that Marfan is caused by a change to FBN-1 (fibrillin). Right now, we know how to test FBN-1 itself. However, there are all kinds of proteins that may create changes to FBN-1 that we haven’t yet identified, and the 5-10% who clearly meet clinical criteria probably have mutations that just haven’t been discovered yet. Confusing, I know.

[Moral of the story: rely more on clinical criteria for a diagnosis and save genetic testing for 1) pregnancy issues and 2) when it’s hard to get a clear diagnosis .]

Aaaanway. So, you want the genetic test to locate your mutation. There are a few different labs that do the test, but I hear that all labs are not created equal. Tulane University’s Matrix DNA Diagnostics lab was the first in the country to do the FBN-1 test and is spoken highly of. I had my test done there 4 years ago. Click here to download their FBN-1 testing information. Many insurance companies are now covering this test, but if not, the initial test will cost $1400 (from Tulane). You can have your blood drawn anywhere and shipped overnight to Tulane. If you live in the US, it will take 5-6 weeks for you to get your results.

Once your mutation has been identified, you and your partner will need to find a center that does pre-implantation diagnosis in-vitro fertilization. Basically, the doctors will create embryos in the Petri dish and test them for the mutation that you have. [Each family shares the same mutation but manifestations of that mutation vary, meaning some family members might be mildly affected and others more severely affected.] If you’ve produced an embryo that doesn’t have Marfan (which is not a guarantee), one will be implanted in the uterus and if the implementation works, your child shouldn’t have Marfan.

If you’ve gone the old-fashioned route, you can still find out right away if your child has Marfan (providing you had the genetic test). You can test the baby in utero using amniocentesis, or you can wait till he’s born. We used Menininho’s cord blood and had the sample shipped to Tulane the same day he was born (needed to be the same lab where my test was done). When doing testing on other family members like this, the test is only $350 and results can be had in 2-3 weeks.

If you do not do genetic testing, it may take much longer to find out if your children are affected. It is my understanding that the aorta is not stable until 3 years of age so it may not be useful to do an echo prior to this point. A slip lamp eye exam should be done around 18 months of age so that any potential vision problems can be addressed so as not to interfere with physical development, like walking. Because Marfan is progressive, it may take years to know if children are affected. Routine echoes and eye exams are recommended to catch any problems early, since preventative medicine is best.

OK, I think that covers the bulk of it. I’m sure there are things I’m forgetting. Always feel free to post questions on this or other questions and I’ll help you find the answers! Further information on genetic testing and labs that will do the FBN-1 test can be found via the National Marfan Foundation. Amy Kaplan is their nurse and you can contact her at akaplan@marfan.org.

The opinions offered at Musings of a Marfan Mom are for informational purposes only and are not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding Marfan syndrome and any medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking care because of something you have read here.

January 4, 2010
by marfmom
6 Comments

Pregnancy in Marfan

There’s seemingly a dearth of information about pregnancy and delivery in Marfan patients and it’s a subject I get a lot of questions on. I was really lucky to happen to live in a city with an OB who specialized in Marfan and have access to one of the country’s top cardiologists during the latter half of my care (he’s now my regular cardiologist, since we moved to California). So, I’d like to share what I’ve learned from my experience, my doctors, and reading up online in a two part series. This week is Pregnancy in Marfan and next Monday come back for Delivery in Marfan.

Please keep in mind that I am not a doctor myself, and (like everything else in Marfan), what works for MOST patients may not be what’s right for YOU. Do your own research and talk with your doctors and experts! The National Marfan Foundation has resources online and in print.

Contrary to the information doctors had a generation ago, pregnancy is ok for many women with Marfan. For women with an aortic root under 4.0 cm, they are at the least amount of risk of aortic dissection (just slightly above the risk for what it would be if they weren’t pregnant). For women between 4.0 cm – 4.49 cm pregnancy can still be ok, just with an increased risk (most likely proportional to aortic size). Pregnancy is not recommended for women with an aortic root of 4.5 cm or above unless valve sparing surgery is done first (Meijboom, et. all, 2005). I can imagine that pregnancy would also not be recommended right away for someone with a rapidly growing aorta. I have not found measurements for other parts of the aorta. There is also the risk of descending aortic dissection without a pre-existing dilation of the aorta. I found out about this after I delivered Menininho and plan to ask my doctor for more information when I see him next month.

Medication should be continued during pregnancy to help prevent growth of the aorta (Elkayam, Ostrzega, Shotan, & Mehra, 1995). Not all medications are safe during pregnancy. For instance, Losartan/Cozaar is not recommended during pregnancy, particularly the first trimester, so you should talk with your doctor about moving to another medication before trying to conceive. Talk with your doctor about your particular medication. My OB monitored my baby’s heart rate at every prenatal visit because of a couple of case studies that mentioned bradycardia (slow heart rate) as a possible side effect for babies whose mothers were taking beta blockers (which I was taking at the time). However, my team also told me that since there were only two case studies it’s possible the bradycardia was not related to the medications at all but was related to the mothers having hypertension, which can cause complications on its own.

Aortic monitoring throughout pregnancy is vital. It should be done at least every trimester…every 6-8 weeks if the aorta is 4.0 cm or larger (NMF). This way potential problems can be caught early and your safest delivery can be planned. An echocardiogram is the least invasive measure, although MRIs are also considered safe. CT scans are not typically used during pregnancy because the risks posed to the baby from the radiation.

And again: The opinions offered at Musings of a Marfan Mom are for informational purposes only and are not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding Marfan syndrome and any medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking care because of something you have read here.

Citations:
Elkayam, U., Ostrzega, E., Shotan, A., & Mehra, A. (1995). Cardiovascular problems in pregnant women with the Marfan syndrome. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2, 117-122.

Meijboom, L. J., Vos, F. E., Timermans, J., Boers, G. H., Zwinderman, A. H., Mulder, B. J. M. (2005). Pregnancy and aortic root growth in the Marfan syndrome: a prospective study. European Heart Journal, 9, 914-920.

December 31, 2009
by marfmom
20 Comments

2010 Resolutions

I was delighted to see that I could kill two birds with one stone this week by blogging about my New Year’s Resolutions, which also just happens to be Mama Kat’s Writers’ Workshop prompt #5. I hope you all will keep me accountable on these!!!

1) I resolve to exercise 3 days a week. Now that my medicine seems to be helping, my only excuse for not hitting the exercise bike/treadmill/going for a brisk walk is that it’s way more fun to catch up on Heroes episodes online. But now, I’ve got PhD in Parenting and Lactating Girl keeping me honest. If you want to join the Twitter support group, just use the hashtag #mamafit!
2) I resolve to cook more often. Mark & I have been so busy recently that we’ve been making quick and easy dinners. I really want to experiment with gluten free cooking (I’ve been finding some GREAT websites!) and have more formal, sit-down dinners.
3) I resolve to try to work on blog posts ahead of time. Well actually, this is probably a lie. I know I pay for it the next morning, but I just can’t seem to write unless it’s at least 11:30 PM the night before I want to post. Case in point: I tried to start this post Tuesday late afternoon. It’s now close to 1 in the morning on Thursday.
4) Oh, and this one will make my dear husband very happy. In 2010, I resolve to try to clean out and organize my email inbox. Currently I have 6,452 messages. Mark insists this is in no way, shape, or form ok. Neither is my cluttered desktop full of shortcuts and folders and random documents. So honey, this is for you!

What are some of your resolutions? Do you follow through with them? Even bother to make any to begin with?